Home | Consulting | Professional Articles | System Analyst Page 2


The Psychologist As Systems Analyst

NeuroCybernetic Psychology

NeuroCybernetic psychology views the brain as a biocontroller, the control device of the body. It has aspects of a computer as well, but its primary function is control, not computation. This is not an analogy or metaphor, that is, I am not suggesting that the brain is similar to a computer. I mean, rather, the brain is an information processing and control system. As such, it has commonalities with man‑made computers, or vice‑versa, but it is not a computer. It is a biocontroller.

NeuroCybernetic psychology tries to provide a coherent, comprehensive conceptual framework synthesizing broad areas of psychology, including neuropsychology. It is not a model of brain processes, but a hypothetical description of the actual processes used in the brain. It is also not reductionistic because the hypothesized processes are described at a functional psychological level, neither physiological nor anatomical, except for aspects of the proposed Integration System. Nevertheless, where it is valid, there should be complementary physiological and anatomical concepts.

A distinction is made between hardware and software.  Hardware refers to hypothesized structures or processors, while software entails the processes by which these structures operate. It is assumed that the brain consists of several discrete, relatively independent systems, each with specialized functions (Wolff, 1974). Behavior results from the operation of various functional combinations of these systems (Luria, 1966). Processing is hypothesized to be both in parallel and serial.

The processes by which various systems are engaged and sequenced as well as which control or modify operations of each system are the software. The term mind is associated largely software, while brain has more to do with hardware. The distinction is also made between firmware and software. Firmware refers to systems in which operations are largely inherent to the structure of the system, while software refers to operations patterned by informational content derived largely from experience. Firmware operations are amenable to modification by information inputted from the environment, but to a lesser degree than software.

<< Previous Section | Back to Top | Next Section >>

 

  

 

 

 

 

Robert F. Sarmiento, Ph.D © 2003.  All rights reserved.

 

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use